Switalskis represents individuals who have raised serious concerns about orthopaedic treatment, including patients treated by consultant orthopaedic surgeon Dr Leslie Irwin, whose work is now under review at Spire Washington Hospital.

In one case, our client underwent surgery intended to correct a finger deformity following an earlier injury. The procedure did not achieve its intended outcome and instead left her with ongoing pain, restricted movement, and a lasting impact on daily activities and hobbies that were important to her quality of life.

Following a detailed and independent investigation, it was established that the care provided fell below the standard expected of a consultant orthopaedic surgeon. Liability was admitted in full, and we are now in the process of valuing the claim so our client can focus on future treatment, rehabilitation, and moving forward.

This case illustrates how early reassurance, careful investigation and clear, honest advice can help patients navigate what is often an upsetting and confusing situation.

Spire Washington Hospital review: what’s happening?

Spire Washington Hospital has confirmed it is reviewing procedures carried out by a former consultant orthopaedic surgeon, Dr Leslie Irwin, following concerns raised about the standard of care provided to a number of patients. The hospital has said it is contacting affected individuals directly and reviewing treatment in line with NHS England’s National Quality Board Recall Framework.

For many patients, learning that their surgery is being reviewed can be deeply unsettling. People may question whether their treatment was necessary, whether it was carried out appropriately, and whether ongoing pain or loss of function could have been avoided.

At Switalskis, we regularly support individuals who discover potential problems with their medical care long after treatment has taken place. In such circumstances, patients are often left dealing not only with physical symptoms, but with a loss of trust and significant emotional distress.

Hospital-led reviews are intended to identify whether care met appropriate clinical standards and to ensure patients receive support and clear information about what this means for them. While such reviews are important, they can raise difficult questions for patients, including:

• whether surgery was clinically necessary
• whether appropriate imaging and safeguards were used
• whether complications could have been avoided
• whether their outcome may have been different with reasonable care

Seeking independent legal advice does not interfere with a hospital review. Instead, it can help patients understand their position, their rights, and whether further investigation is appropriate.

How Switalskis can help

If you have been contacted by Spire Washington Hospital as part of its review, or if recent media coverage has caused you to question the care you received, it is entirely understandable to feel uncertain or anxious about what to do next.

Our specialist orthopaedic injury and medical negligence solicitors provide clear, independent advice in a supportive and confidential setting. We take the time to listen, explain the process, and help you understand whether your care met the standards you were entitled to expect and, if not, what options may be available to you.